Anasogastric tube is sited in a patient ventilated on the critical care unit.Which one of the following is considered the MOST ACCURATE way of confirming correct positioning?
a) Measurement of the aspirate using pH indicator
strips
b) Auscultation of air insufflated through the nasogastric
tube (the ‘whoosh’ test)
c) Testing the acidity/alkalinity of aspirate
fromthe nasogastric tube using litmus paper
d) Observing the appearance of the aspirate from the
nasogastric tube
Answer: e
Explanation:
There have been a number of safety alerts involving
the misplacement of nasogastric
tubes. The only two recommended methods for confirming correct nasogastric tube
placement are chest radiography and the use of pH
indicator strips or paper. No other
methods including the other three options listed in
the question are considered safe.
The most accurate method for confirming correct tube placement is accurately reported
chest radiography. However, there have been multiple
reports of X-rays being misinterpreted
and minimising X-ray exposure is also important,
particularly in the
critically ill patient. pH testing may be influenced by co-administration of medication
that could elevate the pH level of gastric contents,
e.g. antacids, H2 antagonists and
proton pump inhibitors. There are no known reports
of pulmonary aspirates with a pH
of less than 5.5 so this is a useful cut-off point.
If the pH is greater than this then one
should wait an hour then re-check, as the commonest
reason for a higher pH is
the presence in the stomach of enteral feed. The
gold standard is radiography. In
addition to following insertion, nasogastric tube
position should be re-checked before
administration of feed, at least once daily during
continuous feed, following episodes
of vomiting, retching or coughing and if there has
been any evidence of tube
displacement.
Reference
National Patient Safety Agency. Reducing the harm
caused by misplaced nasogastric
feeding tubes. Patient safety alert 05. NPSA, 21
February 2005. Online at www.npsa.
nhs.uk
(Accessed 30 October 2009)
No comments:
Post a Comment